Husserl and Frege

Husserl and Frege by J. N. Mohanty Download PDF EPUB FB2

This book focuses on the interrelationship between Husserl and Frege regarding their developments in theory of knowledge especially with respect to Husserl’s movement away from psychologism in theory of meaning through the criticism of Frege on Husserl’s early by: Hill argues that once linguistic and historical barriers are removed, Edmund Husserl's critical study of Frege's logic in his Philosophy of Arithmetic provides important insights into issues in Cited by: The Paperback of the Word and Object in Husserl, Frege, and Russell: The Roots of Twentieth-Century Philosophy by Claire Ortiz Hill at Barnes & Noble.

Get FREE SHIPPING on Orders of $35+ Customer information on COVID B&N Outlet Membership Educators Gift Cards Stores & Events Help. Husserl and Frege by Mohanty, J. (Jitendra Nathan), Publication date Topics Husserl, Edmund,Frege, Gottlob,Phenomenology, Analysis (Philosophy) Publisher Bloomington: Indiana University Press Internet Archive Books.

Scanned in China. Uploaded by Lotu Tii on Decem SIMILAR ITEMS (based on Pages: At the turn of the century, Gottlob Frege and Edmund Husserl both participated in the discussion concerning the foundations of logic and mathematics.

Since the s, comparisons have been made between Frege's semantic views and Husserl's theory of intentional acts. In quite recent years, new. Remarks on Sense and Reference in Frege and Husserl.

Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock - - Kant-Studien 73 () Seeing Meaning: Frege and Derrida on Cited by: One hundred years ago Gottlob Frege published a damaging, abusive review (Frege )1 of Edmund Husserl's Philosophy of Arithmetic (Husserl ).2 Although rather a lot has now been written about Frege's review and the role it might have played in the development of Husserl's thought,3 much still remains to be rectified regarding Frege's assessment of the book and the credence his review has.

Offering a collection of fifteen essays that deal with issues at the intersection of phenomenology, logic, and the philosophy of mathematics, this book is divided into three parts. Part I contains a general essay on Husserl's conception of science and logic, an essay of mathematics and transcendental phenomenology, and an essay on Cited by: Ms.

Claire Hill made available to me her Paris thesis on Husserl and Frege, and thereby put me under obligation: her thesis succeeded in drawing attention to many overlooked aspects of the subject matter.

Many friends have encouraged me to write this book: of these, I must specially mention Jim Edie and Elizabeth Stroker. PDF | In the critical discussion of Gottlob Frege’s logic in Edmund Husserl’s Philosophy of Arithmetic,1 Husserl outlines his objections to the use | Find, read and cite all the research.

In a letter dated 24 MayFrege thanked Husserl for sending him a copy of the Philosophy of Arithmetic and Husserl's review of Ernst Schröder's Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik.

In the same letter, Frege used the review of Schröder's book to analyze Husserl's notion of Doctoral advisor: Leo Königsberger (PhD advisor), Carl. At the turn of the century, Gottlob Frege and Edmund Husserl both participated in the discussion concerning the foundations of logic and mathematics. Since the s, comparisons have been made between Frege's semantic views and Husserl's theory of intentional acts.

This article presents and compares Frege’s and Husserl’s conceptions of sense, also taking into account their and correspondence. It is argued that while the similarities between their views speak in favour of a Fregean interpretation of Husserl’s notion of noematic sense, there are also important : Christian Beyer.

Let us begin with the period up towhen Husserl and Frege were explicitly interested in the same topics, logic and mathematics, and the issue was-or, for Husserl, became-psychologism. As is well known, Husserl's book on the foundations of arithmetic was reviewed by Frege, who roundly criticized it as psychologistic.

What. According to the tale, it was Frege's 'devastating' critique of Husserl's book in and the study by Husserl of other of Frege's writings which were responsible for Husserl's abandonment of psychologism in the first volume of his Logische Untersuchungen (3) of / and his embracing of Frege's views on logic, mathematics and their relationship, and of Frege's distinction between sense and reference.

Claire Ortiz Hill is the author of Husserl or Frege. ( avg rating, 5 ratings, 0 reviews, published ), The Road Not Taken. on Husserl's Philosophy /5. At the turn of the century, Gottlob Frege and Edmund Husserl both participated in the discussion concerning the foundations of logic and mathematics.

Since the s, comparisons have been made between Frege's semantic views and Husserl's theory of intentional acts. In quite recent years, new Price: $ Additional Physical Format: Online version: Mohanty, Jitendranath, Husserl and Frege.

Bloomington: Indiana University Press, © (OCoLC) In Husserl or Frege?, Hill and Haddock break new ground in examining Husserl's ideas in relation to those of Georg Cantor, creator of set theory, analytic philosopher Gottlob Frege, and mathematician David Hilbert. This collection of essays offers a fresh and provocative alternative to contemporary mainstream philosophy of mathematics, and.

interpretive tendency, that Husserl, used advisedly, would permit the elucidation and perhaps the abolition of a difficulty in Frege's philosophy of logic closely linked to the position of the intermediary sphere of Sense.

We need to put the myth of the "third realm" out of our minds, and on this point Husserl can help us uproot. In the same letter, Frege used the review of Schröder's book to analyze Husserl's notion of the sense of reference of concept words.

Hence Frege recognized, as early asthat Husserl distinguished between sense and reference. Consequently, Frege and Husserl independently elaborated a theory of sense and reference before 27 Regarding the issue of psychologism and Frege’s influence, we can roughly distinguish two camps: on the one hand, scholars following Følles­dal, argue that in the early s Husserl was still in his “psychologistic slumbers” and that Frege’s review of the Philosophy of Arithmetic awakened him to anti-psychologism, on the Cited by: 2.The book contributes to the refutation of the separation of philosophy in the 20th century into analytic and continental.

It is shown that Edmund Husserl was seriously concerned with issues of so-called analytic philosophy, that there are strict parallelisms between Husserl’s treatment of philosophical subjects and those of authors in the analytic tradition, and that Husserl had a strong.